MEETING THE CHALLENGE OF DEEP UV OPTICS

By David Collier and Wayne Pantley, Alpine Research Optics

David Collier is President and Wayne Pantley is Sales Manager of Alpine Research Optics, 3180 Sterling Circle, Boulder, CO 80301, 303-444-3420, FAX 303-444-1686, E-mail AROcorp@AROcorp.com, http://www.optics.org/arocorp/

Applications such as microlithography and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) are creating a growing demand for high precision optical components that operate in the deep UV (below 250 nm). Some of this need is being met with components fabricated from CaF2 , a crystalline material that transmits from 130 nm to 10 µm. Historically, CaF2 has been used mostly for its infrared transmission, so adaptations in how bulk material and finished components are produced must be made in order to meet the special requirements of deep UV operation. This article will review those performance requirements and then examine the new technologies being developed by both material and component producers.

Background

The single most important and technically demanding application for UV optics is microlithography, used to produce integrated circuits (ICs). The latest microlithography production systems use excimer lasers, with output at 248 nm. However, a move to excimer lasers operating at 193 nm, and possibly 157 nm, is already underway in order to achieve smaller circuit features. While fused silica components are adequate for 248 nm, refractive optical systems at 193 nm often use at least some CaF2. And at 157 nm, CaF2 is virtually the only useful transmissive material.

In the microlithographic process, an excimer laser is used to illuminate a circuit pattern (called a reticle), that is then projected at a high reduction ratio on to a photoresist covered silicon wafer. Presently, most ICs have feature sizes of about 0.35 µm, with 0.25 µm geometries just coming on-line. The use of 193 nm and 157 nm systems will allow feature sizes smaller than 0.1 µm. Needless to say, producing a lens system that delivers this kind of resolution is extremely difficult. In order to meet this resolution challenge, a typical microlithography projection lens has over 25 elements, with some being more than 1 foot in diameter. In fact, it's not uncommon for a projection lens to weigh over 100 pounds.

Excimer lasers only operate in the pulsed mode, so each exposure actually consists of a number of pulses. The projection optics typically experience fluences in the 0.1 mJ/cm2 to 1 mJ/cm2 per pulse range. Some of the other optics in the system are subjected to fluences in the 1 mJ/cm2 to the several mJ/cm2 per pulse range. Since a production line system might involve several million pulses per day, the high replacement cost means that the optics must be able to withstand several billion pulses over their lifetime.

Material Production

In order to meet the size, quality and quantity requirements of microlithography, material producers are engaging in an ongoing effort to improve CaF2 . For example, Bicron (Solon, OH) has specifically focused their development efforts for "excimer grade&qupt; CaF2 on the following areas:

Improved deep UV transmission
Higher damage threshold
Lower fluorescence
Lower index homogeneity
Reduced stress birefringence
Increased physical size
Higher quantity production

The naturally occurring, mined CaF2 material that is acceptable for most IR applications is completely inadequate in regard to these parameters. Instead, synthetic CaF2 is typically produced using the Stockbarger method. In this approach, a crucible containing molten material is slowly lowered through a "freeze-zone" where crystallization takes place. The entire process typically takes 6-8 weeks for a batch.

figure 1
Schematic of the Stockberger CaF2 fabrication method.
figure 1

Bicron has adapted the Stockbarger technique (figure 1) to improve the parameters just identified. Specifically, the furnace has been modified to create a freeze-zone that allows tighter control over crystal growth, and to enable the use of more sophisticated process control instrumentation for better regulation of temperature, vacuum and the annealing process. These latter factors are particularly important, as they govern material homogeneity and stress birefringence. The results have been quite dramatic. Over approximately the past year, stress birefringence of production parts has been reduced from a value of 20 nm/cm (a typical value for Stockbarger produced CaF2 crystals) to just 1 nm/cm. These innovations have also enabled Bicron to scale up their production process; they now routinely produce CaF2 ingots of 24" in diameter by 6" in length, with the capability to go as large as 36" in diameter.

The primary factor affecting the transmission, damage threshold, color center formation and fluorescence of the final crystal is the purity of the materials used. To this end, Bicron utilizes a variety of testing methodologies (VUV and UV/VIS spectrophotometry, fluorescence spectroscopy, etc.) to detect about 50 different contaminants during production of the precursor materials from which the CaF2 is created. At each process step, specific impurities are targeted for chemical elimination. Ongoing development and rigorous application of these techniques at Bicron over the past year has lowered typical contaminant levels from 10 ppm to under 0.5 ppm.

Further material purification is also performed during the crystal growth process. Chemical "scavengers" are placed in the crucible during crystallization; these are selected to react with any remaining impurities. In addition to the scavengers traditionally used in the Stockbarger technique, Bicron has developed a number of new chemicals that are designed to react and produce gaseous by-products. These can then be easily removed from the process by vacuum pumps.

Component Fabrication

Meeting the performance demands of microlithography objectives, as well as other excimer laser optics, has also required development in optical polishing techniques. Typical component tolerances for flat excimer laser optics are 1/10 wave flatness and 10-5 surface quality. Keep in mind that a 1/10 flatness specification at 193 nm is over three times flatter than that same specification at 633 nm, so these are very tight tolerance optics. Surface imperfections also take on much more importance at shorter wavelengths due to diffraction.

The challenge of meeting these specifications in CaF2 is made even more difficult by the fact that it is an inherently difficult material to process. CaF2 is hygroscopic, soft and very prone to chipping, particularly at the edges. Material that chips off during polishing may then be dragged over the soft surface of the component, leading to sleeks (sleeks are small surface scratches). The result is that the polishing time needed to achieve a given surface quality on CaF2 is typically 50% to 100% longer than for glass.

Manufacturers involved in polishing CaF2 have each developed their own techniques for working with the material. At ARO, our solution has involved a number changes to our standard polishing methods. First and foremost, we have environmentally isolated the polishing area for CaF2 from the rest of our production area. This prevents small airborne particulates from our glass and silica polishing operations from settling on the optics and causing scratches. Fine debris from CaF2 polishing (mostly salt crystals from fluoride material) must also be continuously evacuated from the production area.

The use of dedicated polishing equipment is also necessary because CaF2 requires different polishing compounds than glass and silica. Diamond and sapphire grits are used at the initial stage because their hardness speeds material removal. Unfortunately, these compounds also cause sleeking, so their use requires a delicate timing balance. The edge bevels of CaF2 must even be smoothed or polished to minimize edge chipping effects. We have also found pad-polishing speeds up the process as compared to conventional pitch laps. This is because polishing compounds stays on the surface of the polyurethane pads, whereas it becomes embedded in pitch laps.

Testing

Extensive effort is also being expended to improve the testing of excimer grade CaF2 optics, especially under the conditions encountered in microlithography. A group at MIT's Lincoln Laboratory (funded by Sematech), led by Mordechai Rothschild and Vladimir Liberman, is at the forefront of these efforts.

figure 2
Schematic of the MIT Lincoln Lab excimer laser optics test setup.
figure 2

In the Lincoln Lab test setup (figure 2), the combined output from two excimer lasers operating at 193 nm is split into a total of 12 separate beams. Each beam is then sent through three 80 mm long samples; both CaF2 and fused silica are tested simultaneously. A long path length is helpful because this accentuates bulk material effects, making them easier to separate from surface effects. Each laser operates at 400 Hz, but by combining their output, an overall repetition rate of 800 Hz is attained; approximately 70 million pulses are delivered over the course of a day. Testing is not conducted seven days a week (due to maintenance downtime), so the total exposure is about one billion pulses per month. Exposure fluences range from 0.3 mJ/cm2 to 3 mJ/cm2 per pulse along various beam lines.

One of the most interesting results obtained so far is that transmission actually increases after an initial period of irradiation, a phenomenon termed "surface transmission recovery." This occurs because the excimer laser is actually ablating some of the contaminants left on the surface from the polishing process (hydrocarbons adhere well to the surface of CaF2 , making it harder to clean than glass).

Testing conducted over the past two years has helped manufacturers to achieve a steady improvement in material quality; the bottom line result is that transmission degradation of excimer grade CaF2 is not a major problem at fluences below 1 mJ/cm2 per pulse for today's material. At higher fluences, results are less clear. Because the testing conditions cannot be accelerated, the group also hasn't been able to accurately quantify total lifetime performance yet. In fact, probably the most important conclusion drawn from the testing to date is that initial material measurements do not necessarily correlate with extended use performance. Consequently, the consumer cannot simply purchase components for excimer laser applications based on manufacturer's nominal specifications. The long term characteristics of the product must be established.

Microlithography advances have created an increasing demand for high volumes of large, high quality excimer laser optics. The benefits of the innovations made to meet this need are trickling down to other applications for deep UV optics as manufacturers learn to produce better components with improved economy. However, testing to date has proven that the end user must look beyond vendor's printed specifications to understand long term performance.

Figure Captions

1 Schematic of the Stockbarger CaF2 fabrication method.
2 Schematic of the MIT Lincoln Lab excimer laser optics testing setup.